Single-Contract With A Twist
By: , Tow Squad News. Published on: Subscribe in a reader
Warning: in_array() expects parameter 2 to be array, string given in /home/agencyha/domains/towsquad.net/wp-content/plugins/facebook-button-plugin/facebook-button-plugin.php on line 277
Close Bidding Leads to Lawsuit, Joint Contract
COLUMBUS l When it comes to city-ordered dispatches in the capital of Ohio, a much-coveted five-year contract is usually signed with an area towing firm after the standard bidding process. This time around, however, the final decision was complicated by lawsuits, conflicts of interest, and environmental protection.
In the end, two of the three bidding firms joined forces to suggest splitting the workload between them, ending a six-month battle over the roughly 24,000 annual city-ordered tows in Columbus. The city council ultimately agreed.
The bidding kicked off last October with three companies each submitting a figure and proposal. Metropolitan Towing had the highest, at $2.48 million. Pro-Tow’s bid of $2.38 million was slightly more than the lowest bid, $2.37 million submitted by Columbus Towing.
However Pro-Tow received a $20,000 credit deduction, listed as an enviromental preference. Their proposal included a letter of compliance with the state’s EPA standards. When applied, Pro-Tow became the low bidder and was awarded the contract.
That plan was derailed when Stacy Willis, owner of Columbus Towing, filed a lawsuit claiming the environmental credit should not have been a factor. An attorney for Willis told The Columbus Dispatch that Pro-Tow’s so-called green efforts were actually all mandated by the EPS, and therefore not valid.
Metropolitan Towing also disputed the decision, battling over a contract that some say is worth more than it cash value.
“It’s not very lucrative,” police spokesman George Speaks told the Dispatch, “but companies get their name out there and they establish a relationship with police.”
To resolve the dispute, the city has agreed to split the contract between Columbus Towing and Pro-Tow, with each receiving roughly half their bid amount.
“We’ve never had companies be this close in the bidding process,” Speaks said. “It never was an issue before. In the end we get savings for the public and we kept the price relatively the same as the previous towing contract we signed five years ago.”
Want to share your own story?
or call 888-603-2599.
More Fresh Towing News
James Lewis of Valley Automative looks at the realities of party/property impounds…
The law would require operators to notify local police before each removal along with a description of the vehicle, where it was towed from and where it’s being stored.
The Beaver State may soon require specific rate caps for all ‘patrol towing,’ more commonly known as predatory towing.
BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court rules against New Hampshire towing firm in highly-anticipated decision.
Industries are at odds over lack of boot regulations. Lawmakers are set to vote on two proposed bills this week.